The Product Seeding Form

The form is the gateway between your recruitment ad and your Discord community. It does three jobs at once: collects what you need to ship product, qualifies the applicant against your avatar, and routes them into a contract step that pre-trains commitment before they ever see the product.

This is the cheapest, fastest way to get leads for creators that I've ever found. And honestly — the system itself is generalizable. I've used variations of this exact flow for hires, partnerships, sourcing freelancers — anywhere you need to filter a pool of inbound applicants down to the ones who actually intend to do what they say they will. Creators is just the highest-volume use case.

This sub-page covers how I run V2 of the seeding form right now. Where it makes sense, I'll flag what I changed from V1 (the version I ran on the TikTok Shop brand a year ago) and why.

Why a form (and not Insense, Join Brands, etc.)

Most operators don't run their own seeding form. They use creator-marketplace tools like Insense or Join Brands. Those tools are fine — they just cost $750–$1,500/mo and force you into their pricing structure for content, on top of needing real outreach effort to get creators to actually bite.

Running your own form changes the math:

• You're paying for ads, not for access. A few bucks a day in lead ads gets you applicants. No platform fee on top.
• You go out and get them, instead of waiting for them to come to you. Outbound at this scale is impossible on platforms like TikTok Shop where you have to wait for creators to discover you.
• You choose when to scale. Pause the ads any time. Crank them up. No commitments. No platform telling you what your campaign should look like.

I've gotten one brand to 300 creators in the database on a $10/day budget over the course of a month. On another brand more recently, I had 50+ submissions in 2 days at a $25/day budget — had to turn the campaign off because we couldn't keep up with the inflow at our scale.

This is the cheapest and fastest way to fill an affiliate pipeline I've ever found.

Tool choice — where to host the form

I'll save you the long version: use Google Forms.

I've tested all three options that matter:

• Google Forms — free. Integrates with Google Sheets natively. The integrations and automations you'll want (auto-routing applicants by status, sending follow-up emails on a schedule, tagging by qualification tier) can all be built with Google Apps Script — and you don't even need to write the script yourself anymore. Ask Claude to write the App Script for whatever automation you need and paste it in. This used to be the reason I moved off Google Forms. It's no longer a reason.
• Typeform — slick UI, conversational form flow, paid. Worth it if you want a more polished applicant experience. The UX advantage gets you maybe 5–10% better completion rates in my experience. Not worth the cost for most operators.
• Monday.com — what I was using when I recorded the original version of this lesson. Expensive, especially when you start paying for the integrations and automations. Now that Claude can write the Google Apps Script equivalent of those integrations for free, the case for Monday.com falls apart. Save your money. Use Google Forms.

V1 was Monday.com. V2 is back to Google Forms with Claude + Apps Script automating the routing and follow-ups. Cheaper. Cleaner. Works.

The form structure

This is the actual flow I run now. Each section has a job.

Section 1: Contact information

You need this to ship product and to do follow-up communication.

• Full name
• Email address — this is the primary communication channel now (more on why below)
• Phone number — for SMS follow-ups if needed, but no longer the primary outreach channel
• Full shipping address — for product delivery (or use Shopify Collabs as a workaround, more on this below)

Section 2: Avatar qualification

These are your filter questions. Use ChatGPT to draft them based on your specific avatar.

• Demographic confirmation — "Are you between 25 and 45?" "Are you a parent?" "Do you live in [region]?" Whatever defines your avatar.
• Use-case / condition qualification — if your product solves a specific problem, confirm they have it. Example for a joint health brand: "Do you suffer from arthritis or a similar joint condition?" Yes/no. People who say no get filtered out automatically.

You're not building a content pool for everyone. You're building one for your specific avatar. Be ruthless on this filter.

Section 3: Content + creator basics

• "Are you open to creating content for our brand?"
• "What kind of content do you currently make?" — open-text. Use this to identify creators with existing audiences, parenting content, lifestyle content, etc. The answers are a data goldmine over time.
• "Provide your social handles" — Instagram, TikTok, YouTube. You need these to vet them and to potentially run partnership ads with their accounts later.
• "Are you based in the US?" (or whatever geo) — confirm the avatar match.

Section 4: The Signwell contract (V2 update)

This is where the biggest change from V1 lives.

In V1, I embedded the full T&Cs inline in the form — long, scary, paragraphs of contract language with a "do you agree?" question at the end. It worked okay, but the percentage of people who actually filmed content after applying was lower than I wanted. Around 30% at best on the V1 system.

The fix in V2: send applicants to a Signwell contract that they have to actually sign.

After they finish the basic form, the form's thank-you screen sends them to a Singwell template link. They open it. They read the contract (a more detailed version of the T&Cs from V1). They fill in their name and date. They sign it.

Then the contract comes back to my team. We review it, and then we sign it on our end.

Only after both signatures are in place does the applicant get any of the other access — the Shopify Collabs invite, the free product, the Discord invite. None of it triggers without the signed contract.

Why this is materially better than the inline-T&Cs approach:

• It's a real contract, not a click-through agreement. People treat it differently. The signing step itself is a commitment ritual.
• Filters out half-committed applicants automatically. People who weren't going to deliver content rarely take the time to sign a real contract.
• Gives you actual legal recourse. If a creator takes free product and ghosts, you have a signed agreement to enforce.
• Builds trust on the creator side. It feels professional, not sketchy. A creator signing a contract feels like a business deal — which is what it should feel like.

V2 reduces the volume of approved applicants. Fewer people make it through the contract step. But the percentage of approved creators who actually deliver content is dramatically higher because the filter is doing its job upfront instead of after you've already shipped product.

Section 5: Confirmation flow

After the applicant signs the Singwell contract, the form's confirmation screen sends them back to a Singwell confirmation link letting them know:

• We've received their signed contract.
• We'll review and sign on our end.
• If everything checks out, they'll get an invite to claim their free product and join the community.

This sets expectation, reduces "where's my product?" follow-up emails, and gives a clear next step.

Shipping the product — Shopify Collabs (V2 update)

In V1, you had two options for getting product to approved creators:

• Manual shipping — get full address in the form, manually push the order through your supplier or 3PL.
• 100% off discount code — give approved creators a code, they place an order on your store like a normal customer, your normal fulfillment flow ships it.

The 100% off code workaround was the cheap way to do this without paying for Social Snowball (which automates a similar flow but is expensive at scale).

In V2, I'm using Shopify Collabs instead. Here's how it works:

• After the contract is fully signed (both sides), my VA sends the approved creator an email invite to my Shopify Collabs program.
• Creator clicks the link, joins Shopify Collabs.
• Inside Collabs, they claim their free gift (the product), which triggers fulfillment automatically through Shopify.
• They also get their Shopify Collabs affiliate link at the same time, which auto-tracks their sales going forward.
• Email invite to the Discord goes out at the same time.

This consolidates three steps (free product + affiliate link + community access) into one Shopify Collabs onboarding flow. Less manual VA work. Less context switching for the creator. Cleaner.

Shopify Collabs is free, which is the main reason I'm running this instead of Social Snowball right now. The functionality has gotten meaningfully better in recent updates. If you're at scale and Social Snowball's automation features become worth the cost, switch then.

The 14-day content window with follow-ups (V2 update)

In V1, creators had 7 days from receipt of product to deliver the content. The thinking was: shorter window = less ghosting.

In V2, I extended this to 14 days and built in a follow-up email cadence that runs out to 28 days.

The reasoning: 7 days was sometimes too tight for creators who actually wanted to make good content. They'd panic, ship something rushed, and the content would underperform. 14 days gives them time to actually plan and produce well — and the extended follow-up window catches the slow producers without losing them entirely.

The follow-up emails handle the ghosting risk that the shorter window was supposed to solve:

• Day 3 after delivery: "Hey, did your product arrive? Excited to see what you make. Here are some content ideas if you want a head start: [prompts/concepts]."
• Day 7: "Halfway through your window. Send through what you have or let me know if you're stuck."
• Day 14: "Today's your delivery deadline per the contract. Send through what you've got."
• Day 21: "Past deadline — but still want to honor the agreement. Send what you can."
• Day 28: "Final call. After today, the contract terms apply."

Each email contains content prompts and specific ideas. The point is to push creators who intended to deliver to actually deliver, and to give the ones who weren't going to deliver progressively fewer excuses.

The longer tail also catches a real category of creator who genuinely wanted to deliver but life got in the way. Without the 21- and 28-day touchpoints, you lose those people entirely. With them, a meaningful percentage circle back and produce.

The combination of the longer window + extended follow-up cadence pushes overall delivery rates up while reducing the rushed, low-quality content we got under the 7-day pressure cooker.

Communication channel — email only (V2 update)

In V1, my VA reached out to applicants via SMS using OpenPhone (or similar VA-friendly texting tools).

I no longer do this.

The reason: some applicants would call back. Or they'd text questions that turned into long conversations. The VA was getting eaten by communication overhead that didn't move anything forward.

V2 is email only. All confirmations, all follow-ups, all updates go through email. If a creator wants to reach me, they can email back — and the asynchronous channel is way easier for the VA to manage at volume.

If you're at very small scale (<20 creators in the funnel) and you want a more personal touch, SMS still works. At any kind of volume, email wins on operations every time.

The IFVA profile setup

Quick tactical note that most operators miss.

When the IFVA (your Influencer VA) joins the Discord and starts welcoming creators and managing the community, their profile should match the avatar you're recruiting for. Not their real name, not your VA's actual identity — a profile built for the role.

If you're recruiting moms, the profile is something like Rosie White (or whatever generic-mom name fits), with a stock-style profile picture of a woman in the avatar's demographic. The IFVA writes messages in that voice.

This sounds dumb until you understand why it works. Creators feel more comfortable in a community moderated by someone who looks like them. They engage more, ask more questions, share more wins. The moderation feels peer-to-peer instead of top-down. Engagement compounds.

You're not lying about anything. The IFVA is real. You're just wrapping the role in a brand-appropriate persona.

The cost math

These are rough estimates from when I ran V1, not exact numbers — I'm not going back into the ad account to pull the spreadsheets. The point is the order of magnitude, not the precise dollars.

V1 estimates (TikTok Shop brand, ~year ago):

• Cost per qualified applicant: ~$8 at the best running of this system
• % of qualified who actually delivered and posted content: ~30%
• Effective cost per piece of delivered content (ad spend only, before COGS + shipping): roughly $25–$30

V2 trade-off (current brand, V2 system):

• Fewer applicants make it through the full Singwell + Shopify Collabs flow. The friction is intentional.
• Higher percentage of those who do make it actually deliver content. Real V2 numbers still being measured but the difference qualitatively is significant.
• Net: similar or slightly better cost per piece of delivered content, with materially better content quality from the creators who do come through.

Compare either of these to paying a UGC creator $300–$1,500 per video. The system is 10–50x cheaper per piece of content even at V1's lower delivery rate. V2 just shifts the curve toward better quality.

What's next

The ad campaign that drives traffic to this form is its own piece of the puzzle. Daily budget, ad creative, targeting, headline structure — all of that lives in the next sub-page.

Want the full, video version? Every SOP, notes, extra information, plus calls & a chat with me inside our 1,000+ member community — here inside the RunItUp Masterclass → Join here

Join now to lock in your rate, prices are increasing quickly.